Creative Writing and Undergraduate Research

Written by Suzanna Geiser, GRC and graduate student in the Department of English and Comparative Literature

We often consider the production of a work of fiction a wholly creative endeavor but, as award-nominated North Carolina author Judith Stanton* recently informed attendees of her lecture titled “Write a Better Novel, Short Story, or Poem: Strategies for Research,” the process often involves diligent, focused research. Stanton described how even the choice of a character’s name requires that the author investigate the popularity of names in the era in which the fictional text is set. Failing to research even this seemingly insignificant detail could render the work less authentic and, therefore, less compelling to the reader.

This advice was particularly relevant to those in the audience who were students in the course for which I was the Graduate Research Consultant, Professor Jeanne Moskal’s undergraduate seminar, Jane Austen: Then and Now. The focus of the course was Pride and Prejudice and the way in which it has been represented in film and print. While students spent most of the semester analyzing adaptations, parodies, and extensions of the novel, their final writing assignment afforded them the opportunity to participate in the creation of a researched representational text. They were given three creative options: (1) compose an imitation of Austen’s narrative style, (2) compose a short incident from a memoir in which the main character engages in a substantive conversation with Austen, or (3) write a short précis of Austen “fan fiction” and sketch a research question that would inform the prospective work; then find, read, and analyze one source that addresses the question posed. It was to reinforce the notion that research can and does enrich creative writing of the sort the students were assigned that Professor Moskal arranged for Stanton to speak about her own research process, and it was to share Stanton’s insights that Professor Moskal asked me to extend an invitation to any interested faculty and graduate students in the Department of English and Comparative Literature.

Stanton’s lecture offered all attendees practical advice on how to perform the research necessary to create a work of fiction that is both realistic and accurate. Stanton structured her talk around four research guidelines, each of which she supplemented with anecdotes of her own research experience. First, she advised her audience to “just google it,” with the admonition to remember that not all of what one finds on the internet is authoritative.  Second, she suggested engaging in “old-fashioned research,” such as reading popular print materials or investigating blogs or forums on one’s fictional interest. Third, she emphasized the importance of conducting field research. As an example, Stanton described how she became involved in the competiStantontive equestrian community in preparation for her latest contemporary suspense novel set in that arena. Fourth, she recommended that prospective creative writers “take it from their own lives,” detailing several instances in which she had fictionalized her own life experience in order to further the plot of a novel. Stanton followed her outline of a research methodology with a discussion of the significance of style in the composition of poetry or prose. Specifically, she explained the need to develop an aesthetic that speaks to the audience with whom the writer means to engage. To illustrate her point, Stanton described how authors of contemporary and historical romances adhere to certain stylistic conventions when producing texts for the typical romance reader. At the close of her lecture, Stanton invited questions from the audience. Several of the undergraduates took this opportunity to inquire about research strategies related to their specific creative project.

Overall, the event was a successful conclusion to Professor Moskal’s creative writing “inspiration” week, which began with a presentation by Dr. Sarah Marsh, who holds an MFA in poetry from University of Pittsburgh. In addition to lecturing about her dissertation research on Austen’s unwell heroines, Dr. Marsh offered numerous suggestions for the students in the beginning stages of their creative assignments. After listening to the two talks, the students came up with numerous funny and fascinating innovations upon Pride and Prejudice, such as: setting the action among UNC fraternities and sororities, in Manhattan, or in the Wilmington Azalea Festival; recasting Regency dialogue using idioms of the American South; and making Lizzie and Darcy’s romance interracial or same-sex. The class members also crafted research questions on such topics as common names in the Regency period, Regency social dancing, Regency gambling, and the fortunes of feminist thought in the years before Austen. Ultimately, it was these two presentations that provided the students with a foundation for developing their own creative research and writing methodology and for producing well-grounded creative works.

*Judith Stanton is the author of several novels, including Wild Indigo (1998), His Stolen Bride (1999), The Mad Marquis (2003), The Kissing Gate (2004), and A Stallion to Die For (2012). Her forthcoming works include Under a Prairie Moon (2013), A Horse Named Hero (2014), and The Deer Diaries, a poetry chapbook (2014).

 

Undergraduate Research in Social Psychology: Plagiarism Narratives

Written by Dr. Melanie Green and Graduate Research Consultant Keenan Jenkins, Department of Psychology

In our PSYC260H (Social Psychology) class, we conducted research about interactive narratives (i.e. choose-your-own-adventure stories) and attitude change. Specifically, we looked at an issue that is unfortunately prevalent on college campuses – plagiarism. Our hypothesis was that reading an interactive narrative, relative to a linear narrative, would lead to greater attitude change about plagiarism (i.e., less approval of plagiarism).

In most Social Psychology classes, students typically spend one or two days learning about research methods, and that’s it. In our class, we gave the students a semester-long tutorial on the research process; the students had the opportunity to participate in every aspect of the project. The narratives that we used for the experiment were almost entirely composed by the students. Each student picked a section of the narrative to write, and then we pieced it together to create a coherent story. We also explained the necessity of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) process so the class would understand how important ethical practices are in research. Students also contributed to the recruitment of study participants; in addition to recruiting students from the PSYC101 volunteer pool, our students recruited their friends through social media. (This was easy to do because the entire experiment took place online, which also allowed individuals to participate anonymously.) After data collection and a presentation of the data analysis from GRC Keenan, the students had an opportunity to draw some of their own conclusions about the results. This entire process has really put their intellect on display. Most of the students had never done any type of research, but they seemed like naturals; they often thought of connections and extensions that we didn’t think of ourselves!

One important benefit of incorporating a research project into the class was that it allowed the students to see “behind the scenes” of the research process. Students enjoyed having insight into the amount of detail and development that happens for even a relatively simple study. They were excited about having the opportunity to develop materials for the experiment.  It encouraged them to apply the theories they learned about in class in new ways.

The class research project was a success on many levels, but there is always room for improvement.  A challenge for this course was to position the project at a level that was accessible to a 200-level introductory class. Although it was an Honors class with bright and motivated students, many students did not have much background in research methods.  Some students expressed a desire to have had more hands-on involvement with other parts of the process (putting the study through the Institutional Review Board for ethics review; running sessions in a lab).  Although the logistics of doing this with a large group are complex, we will consider these suggestions going forward.  Furthermore, with the benefit of hindsight, we would have provided the background readings earlier in the semester, and encouraged students to do their own literature searches for relevant prior work.

The class project had one other potential broader benefit.  The narrative written by the students changed attitudes as we had hoped: although the study participants had generally negative views of plagiarizing, individuals who read the plagiarism narrative (whether in linear or interactive form) showed significantly more negative attitudes than a control group who did not read a story.

Doing research together with the students added an extra layer of excitement and novelty to the course, and we hope that the students will carry this enthusiasm for discovery forward into other research opportunities.

The GRC Program from an Undergraduate’s Perspective

Written by Dr. Ellen R. Welch, Assistant Professor of French

This semester, students in FREN 330 (French Civilization I) explored what it meant to be “civilized” in France from antiquity through the eighteenth century. As a capstone project, students chose artifacts used by “civilized” French subjects during this period, from a medieval ivory chess-piece to an eighteenth-century corset. Each student then set out to research the “biography” of his or her object, discovering who made it, who used it, and why it was important for performing an ideal of refinement and civility. As an instructor, I assign this type of inquiry-based project to engage my students and to challenge them to exercise their creativity, resourcefulness, and library skills. But I also know that students require a good deal of individualized guidance to succeed on such assignments. I’ve come to rely on the Graduate Research Consultant program to make one-on-one research support available to more students than I could help on my own.

Having worked with GRCs for several semesters now, I wanted to know more about my students’ experiences with the program. What motivates them to work with a GRC? Laura Grier, an undergraduate enrolled in FREN 330 this semester, kindly offers her perspective:

“I am a student in French 330: Civilization I, a course about the fabrication and evolution of the concept of “civilization” in French culture. Catherine Costello, our class’s GRC, was a huge help to me while completing our big research project of the semester.

For the project, I had to write the biography of a significant object in French culture – I chose the fork from the sixteenth century. Ms. Costello was helpful with every step of the research project, especially during her office hours, which she offered twice a week. When I met with her at the beginning of the research process, she showed me how to find interesting sources through the Interlibrary Loan and encouraged me to explore some aspects of the object that I hadn’t considered. Later, she helped me identify gaps in my research and topics that I should expand. Ms. Costello was approachable, knowledgeable, encouraging, and genuinely interested in what I learned through my research.

It was rewarding to be able to meet with a GRC for this French project. Not only did I get a lot of valuable feedback on my project, but I learned more about the research process, such as finding and contextualizing useful sources, and putting my research together in a way that is easy to read and follow. Working with Ms. Costello was both beneficial and enjoyable – she is an expert in research, easily accessible, and because she wasn’t grading me on anything, our meetings could be relaxed and informal. I would definitely recommend other students to work closely with their class’s GRC.”

The Bildungsroman Project: Digital Humanities in a Research-Exposure Course

Written by Katherine Carlson, Postdoctoral Fellow in the Department of English and Comparative Literature

In January I was preparing the syllabus for my ENGL 145 – Literature in the Genres course on the bildungsroman. “Bildungsroman” means “formation novel” in German, and the term represents coming-of-age narratives. Great Expectations, Little Women, Jane Eyre, and The Catcher in the Rye are all famous bildungsromane, as are the Harry Potter and Twilight series. One would expect an abundance of online resources regarding such a popular and relevant genre, so I was shocked to find that this is not the case. Less than a week before the semester began, I scrapped all my plans and decided that the class would create our own website to celebrate the art of coming of age. Thus, the Bildungsroman Project was born. You can check it out at http://www.bildungsromanproject.com.

banner text with tree logo entwined CarlsonThe Bildungsroman Project features encyclopedia-style articles on key bildungsromane and their contexts. These articles were written, selected, copyedited, and uploaded by students. Our Graduate Research Consultant, Joe Fletcher, has been a tremendous boon to the project. He guided the copyediting team and met with individual students about their drafts. Because of Joe, I was free to focus on web design, promotion, and pedagogy. Equally significant is the fact that the students got to work with a published creative writer. You can read Joe’s award-winning work at http://www.joefletcherpoetry.com.

One of my favorite aspects of The Bildungsroman Project is its creative component. Students wrote a creative personal essay narrating a representative moment of their own maturation. We were fortunate to have Joe guide us through the drafting process of an essay over an entire course period, and I think writing within the genre we were reading challenged and engaged the students. The project also features photography through a connected Instagram account, and we have a high standard of creativity and design.

Joe’s work with my students benefitted not only them, but future young writers and researchers. I plan to continue to operate the site as an undergraduate journal after the semester ends, and our GRC’s assistance with these founding articles helped produce quality material from which submission candidates can gain inspiration and guidance for years to come.

At noon on this Friday, April 26, we will formally launch the project in Student Union 2420. All the students will share their personal coming-of-age stories, and I will give a brief overview of the website. It should be a wonderful celebration of undergraduate research and creativity, and we welcome all comers. Refreshments will be served.Headshot for About Page Carlson

Friday’s event will also be the last class session I’ll ever convene at UNC, where I did my graduate and postdoctoral work, as I’m off to a tenure-track job next year. I’m excited to tie up my Carolina career with this event, and I hope you’ll join me in celebrating my students’ fine work.

This semester I did 100-level digital humanities pedagogy by the seat of my pants. It was challenging new ground for me, and I’m so grateful to Joe and the Office for Undergraduate Research for providing me a GRC to help share the load.

GRC Alum Profile: Sarah Shair-Rosenfield

Sarah Shair-Rosenfield, Ph.D. ’12, is currently a post-doctoral fellow in the School of Politics and Global Studies at Arizona State University. In the fall, she’ll start as an assistant professor at ASU.  Sarah served as a Graduate Research Consultant for two courses, Designing Democracy (Poli067) and Democratization in Africa (Poli431), both for Professor Andy Reynolds.  One was a first-year seminar and the other an upper-level course filled mostly with senior students. We asked her to share her reflections about the experience.

What was the undergraduate student reaction to being expected to conduct undergraduate research?

On the whole, students seemed extremely interested in the research they were doing. I think a lot of that reaction was encouraged by two things.  First, Professor Reynolds is a very engaging instructor and students in both classes really responded to his overall enthusiasm and expertise in the topics of the courses.  Second, student research projects and presentations focused on a single country; students got to express preferences about the countries they wanted to work on and Professor Reynolds tried to give everyone a chance to do the research on a case they were interested in.  At the end of the day, students got to pursue research in an area/country they were independently interested in and were stimulated by a highly engaging faculty member; it was a great formula for getting them excited about their own research.  There didn’t really seem to be any resistance to the expectation that they conduct this type of research.

I also enjoyed watching student presentations as they represented the sum of the research experience for the students both times I served as a GRC. Presentations tended to be quite impressive and it was nice to have that opportunity to see how my contributions enabled or enhanced their research processes.

Were there any challenges for you as a GRC?

The first time I was a GRC it was actually the first semester I was a full-time UNC teaching assistant with three recitation sections (I had only been a grader before) and so I was new to teaching students myself.  It took a little while to get the hang of how to respond to questions and how to push students to think about how to conduct the research for their projects themselves, rather than simply explaining what information or data they needed to get and from where. Probably the most challenging thing was learning how to teach students HOW to do research and fighting the impulse to help them just do the research.

What advice or recommendations would you offer to new GRCs?

The times I served as a GRC the students were extremely engaged with their research projects and I would say just try to embrace their enthusiasm and never underestimate the scope and depth of research they are capable of, even first years for whom this might be the first time they’ve really undertaken their own research.Sarah Shair-Rosenfield photo

I think it’s also important for new GRCs to know that after they’ve served as a GRC, they can apply to have their own GRC for their own courses. As an advanced graduate student, that opportunity was invaluable for me.  I had the chance to work with two graduate students, one each semester I taught Introduction to Comparative Politics (Poli130), and they helped students with research on individual characters and historical scenarios for role-playing simulations.  The GRCs were amazing, students really liked the additional help and resources they provided, and because they were available to observe the simulations I had another set of eyes and comments/feedback on what worked and didn’t work about the entire process of the research component of the course.  The first GRC helped me to revise some elements of the simulations for the second time I taught the class and the second GRC helped me rethink some of the components for the next time I will teach it.  I would have managed the course without the GRCs but having them as an added resource for my students and I was great.  I really appreciated their contributions and the chance to have their help.  I would strongly encourage GRCs who go on to teach their own courses to incorporate undergraduate research projects and apply for GRCs themselves — it was a great experience and I’m glad I got to take advantage of it.

How has your experience as a GRC been useful in your professional life?

As someone who wanted to finish the dissertation process and then look for a job where teaching was either a primary or secondary focus, I thought the GRC opportunity was extremely useful in terms of how I think through constructing research assignments in my own classes, as well as giving me additional experience in the classroom and advising students doing research projects.

I think the GRC experience really opened me up to new ways to encourage undergraduate research and I’ve tried to incorporate projects that require students to at least engage with or think about how they might go about their own research on a variety of topics in the different classes I taught at UNC and ASU.  I’m also more open to having undergraduates (both in the US and abroad, where most of my own research takes place) involved in my research projects, especially when I see what they can do in their own work.

Empirical Research in POLI 442: International Political Economy

Written by Rob Galantucci, GRC and graduate student in the Department of Political Science

During the Spring 2013 semester, students in Prof. Layna Mosley’s International Political Economy course (Poli 442) are conducting research on the politics of the global economy.  Paper topics relate to the politics of exchange rates to the globalization of production to the effects of international investment on the developing world.  Having already taken a survey course in international relations, the students in Poli 442 are now delving deeper into issues of political economy, and will ultimately produce a piece of original research.  I am fortunate to have the opportunity to work with them as a Graduate Research Consultant.blog1Galantucci

Unlike the many paper assignments that students face on a regular basis, in Poli 442 they are required to develop a set of hypotheses and then test those hypotheses with data.  That is, instead of merely describing how something is, or ought to be, students are asked to provide a causal explanation for observed economic or political phenomena.  Based on their coursework and independent research, students are developing hypotheses relating to major issues of the global economy.  Are certain types of governments more effective at attracting foreign direct investment than others?  Have certain domestic policies contributed to creating housing bubbles in the European Union?

After developing their hypotheses, students then construct an empirical design to test their expectations.  Many use cross-country comparisons to show how a unique set of policies in one country led it to experience different outcomes when compared to a similarly-situated country.  Other students are conducting more micro-level investigations, and are making comparisons at the provincial (or even firm) level.  Still other students are relying on statistical techniques to isolate relationships between a set of variables and their outcome of interest.blog2Galantucci

Although executing these projects can seem daunting at first, the students in Poli 442 are taking advantage of the University’s in-class and out-of-class resources to pursue interesting and ambitious lines of research.  As we met to discuss their paper proposals, many of the students had already identified a handful of datasets that they would use in their research.  Prof. Mosley’s emphasis on empirical research clearly introduced them to the tools needed to begin their research.  The students also benefited from the assistance of the research librarians at Davis Library, in particular Rita Moss, who provided them with a number of databases and sources for background information.  Exposure to these various resources has helped the Poli 442 students take advantage of what a research university like UNC has to offer.  For many students (including myself), it is not until graduate school that they become familiar with the resources that UNC’s undergraduate students use regularly.  This puts our undergrads in a great position to evaluate and produce research early in their academic careers.

 

GRC Alum Profile: Danielle Swick

Dr. Danielle Swick earned her Ph.D. in Social Work in 2007. While at Carolina, she served as a Graduate Research Consultant in Dr. Lawrence Rosenfeld’s Interpersonal Communication class. For Danielle, one of the most memorable aspects of working as a GRC was getting to interact with undergraduate students for the first time and watching them get excited about research. She met with all the students in groups throughout the semester. She liked seeing the research process click for them and found it extremely rewarding to work with the students on their projects from beginning to end.

One of the challenges Danielle experienced was that as a graduate student, she was “immersed in the technical aspects of research, and well versed in what research looks like in the academic world.” She noted that most undergraduates haven’t had that exposure yet. One strategy she found useful was to help students see how what they were learning in the classroom can be applied in the real world.  Swick Headshot

Danielle’s own scholarship is in school-based research and military research. She currently serves as a Research Assistant Professor in the UNC School of Social Work. In August, she’ll begin a tenure-track position at UNC-Greensboro. At UNC-G, she’ll be teaching both undergraduates and graduates; her future colleagues were excited about and interested in her experience as a GRC and facilitating undergraduate research.

Danielle’s advice to current GRCs: Get excited. Be patient. Take the time to sit down with the undergraduate students. Practice being able to explain complex topics in a more accessible manner without using jargon. Have a lot of fun with the opportunity!

Pat Pukkila: Champion of Undergraduate Research

 

As many of you know, the director of the Office for Undergraduate Research, Dr. Pat Pukkila, will be retiring from UNC after 34 impactful years here.  One of the legacies of her leadership is the Graduate Research Consultant Program, which Pat created.  Her many contributions to Carolina and OUR are highlighted in a recent article in the Carolina Arts & Sciences magazineChampion of Undergraduate Research: Pat Pukkila has transformed the Carolina experience.

 

Resources for Inquiry Based Teaching

 

As part of our celebration of the 10th anniversary of the Graduate Research Consultant program, Bringing Research to Scale in the Undergraduate Curriculum, our colleagues at the Center for Faculty Excellence created a bibliography of Resources for Inquiry.  They also partnered with us to publish our occasional paper on Inquiry Based Teaching and Undergraduate Research-Exposure Courses at Carolina, which provides an explanation of the methodology of inquiry-based teaching as well as additional resources.

We hope you might find these documents of use as you reflect on your own teaching practices and/or begin to plan your fall courses.

 

 

GRC Alum Profile: Ali Yanus

When Dr. Alixandra B. Yanus was a graduate student at UNC, she served as a Graduate Research Consultant (GRC) in two courses with Professor Virginia Gray—a first year seminar on Interest Group Politics, and a upper-division class on Advanced State and Local Politics. Recently we asked Ali to share some reflections about her experiences as a GRC with us.

We asked about the undergraduate student reaction to being expected to conduct research as part of their course requirements. Ali notes that “perhaps not surprisingly, the first year students struggled with the concept more than the more advanced students. The more advanced students were largely Political Science majors, and many had taken a political science research methods class. Thus, they had some idea about how to speak the language of research, even if they had not executed a research design before. The first years were a different story. The biggest hurdle with them was explaining that what they thought was a ‘research paper’ in high school wasn’t going to fulfill the requirements of the assignment for the purposes of our course.“

Ali spoke about one of the challenges she encountered in her work as a GRC: “It was very important to Professor Gray that students asked “why” questions.  And, that was one of the biggest “why” questions I was asked was—why does it have to be a why question? Once students got over the initial hurdle of phrasing the question and outlining the paper in their mind, they were usually able to break the empirical research paper into pieces and tackle it in a less intimidating way. I also created a handout to help students with this part of the project— as of last semester, that handout was still being used in classes.”

The most important advice Ali would offer to new GRCs is to “develop a close working relationship with your faculty member; make sure the two of you are on the same page regarding expectations and course assignments.” And, she would definitely recommend that graduate students seek out opportunities to serve as a GRC, stating that “it fostered a working relationship between me and a faculty member that I would not have otherwise had the opportunity to work closely with, especially in my final years of graduate school. I continue to maintain a relationship with Professor Gray, and we will be presenting a research paper together at a conference this spring.”

Ali believes deeply in the need for undergraduates to have access to research experiences and wants to “underscore the importance of undergraduate students conducting empirical research, however crude and rudimentary, in order to build their critical thinking and problem solving skills.” She indicates that her experience working closely with students on conducting empirical research as a GRC encouraged her “to assign similar work to my own students and challenge them to expand their horizons.”

Ali is currently an Assistant Professor of Political Science at High Point University and teaches courses in American Politics, research methods, and the introduction to political science. She also teaches the department’s senior capstone project, which results in a 25-page empirical research paper with original data analysis. Ali serves as the Political Science Department’s liaison to the Undergraduate Research and Creative Works Office at HPU. In addition to incorporating undergraduate research experiences in her classes, Ali supports undergraduate researchers outside the classroom; she has taken several students to the North Carolina Political Science Association conference and is working with two students on potential publication of a section of their thesis research in HPU’s undergraduate research journal.